The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Okay . . . let's try this again.

Moderators: Shirley, Sabo, brian, rass, DaveInSeattle

User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

I had been waiting for this one. I'm guessing that the rest of the Swamp hasn't followed this as closely as I have, so here's what you need to know: Hogan slept with his friend's wife. (Not surreptitiously; the friend was cool with it.) There was a video. Years later, Hogan and the friend had a falling out. The friend (legally named Bubba the Love Sponge) shopped the video around. Gawker bought it and posted it on their site. A judge ordered them to take it down; Gawker refused. Hogan sued, said that he wanted $100M.

The trial just wrapped up, and the jury rewarded him...$115M! Gawker will obviously appeal, and Hogan won't get any money anytime soon. But hoo-boy, that's a lot of money. That's like two Erin Andrews' worth!

You can say a lot of things about Hulk Hogan/Terry Bollea, but you can say a lot worse about Gawker. I've had a love/hate relationship with Gawker and its various sites since the beginning, and this verdict is kind of delicious. (Especially since AJ Daleurio was the editor of Gawker at the time of the incident.) I haven't checked the on-line reaction yet, but I'm sure there's a lot of celebrating and gloating.
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16735
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Johnnie »

To your last line, yes. If my Facebook feed is any indicator.

Since I don't have cable and kinda live through whatever I find while poking around the internet, this whole story was just awkward. I saw headlines the whole time and didn't really care to dig deeper. I'm glad Gawker got handled though. That's worth a chuckle.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

Johnnie wrote:I'm glad Gawker got handled though. That's worth a chuckle.
[sighs] Gawker. I don't know if it's because my political views have grown a bit more moderate as I've aged, or if it's just that I don't like being preached at, but Gawker's editorial side has really bugged me lately. Like, I just came here to read an article about soccer, so don't tell me that I'm a horrible person because I don't hate every police officer on the planet, you know?

Also, they were so sanctimonious about The Fappening, but they've done worse. (They outed Geithner's brother last year, which led to a huge scuffle and exodus/purge of their editorial/writing staff. Strangely, Nick Denton was the one person who acted like an adult in that situation.)
User avatar
govmentchedda
The Dude
Posts: 12674
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:36 pm

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by govmentchedda »

This has been (surprise, surprise) huge down here. Apparently, Daulerio and Denton are both equally liable as well.
Until everything is less insane, I'm mixing weed with wine.
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16735
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Johnnie »

Let's also note:
And:

$115 million verdict in Hulk Hogan sex-tape lawsuit could wipe out Gawker

Which would mean bye bye to Deadspin, Gizmodo, Likehacker, Jalopnik, Kotaku, and Jezebel. That last one deserves it. The others don't.

But if HBO could somehow acquire Deadspin and roll it into The Ringer's eventual media empire....hmmmm.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

^^^

Yeah, I've thought of that. And there are a lot of writers/editors at the Gawker sites (yes, even at Jezebel) whom I admire. I don't want to see anybody lose their job. Deadspin was good, then it was bad, then it was good again, and now it's not so great. But I still kind of love it, you know? We'll sit thru the appeals process and see how this plays out.
User avatar
brian
The Dude
Posts: 27744
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:52 am
Location: Downtown Las Vegas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by brian »

The thought of AJ Daulario scraping up his pathetic nickels to pay Hulk Hogan makes me laugh. Sorry, not sorry.
Bandwagon fan of the 2023 STANLEY CUP CHAMPIONS!
User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

Kind of related, because this came out because of the videos/trial, and because I wasn't Swamping last summer (or at least wasn't Swamping about Hogan last summer): I was really bothered when Hogan was fired by the WWE when the racist stuff was revealed. (He was also given the full Chris Benoit treatment and officially never existed.) Those were private conversations between Hogan and a friend, whom he had just had sex with, and he didn't know that he was being recorded.

There's so much talk about privacy now. The NSA, data breaches, tracking, hacking, etc. And here's a case where political correctness outweighed privacy. As a wrestling fan, I've heard a lot of shitty stories about Hogan over the years, but I never heard anything race-related, so he must have tried to keep that to himself.

I dunno. It's all very sticky. Yeah, he thought and said some awful things a decade ago, but I still hate Gawker more in this situation.
User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

brian wrote:The thought of AJ Daulario scraping up his pathetic nickels to pay Hulk Hogan makes me laugh. Sorry, not sorry.
I didn't read Deadspin for years because of Daulerio. Even after he left, the thought of Deadspin seemed distasteful.

I'm going to bed. Tomorrow, I'm going to read a hundred articles about all of this stuff.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20209
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by rass »

I've been reading Deadspin off and on for a long time. Started reading io9 when it came along. I guess it was inevitable that at some point I would regularly read the mothership, but I check it multiple times a day at this point and I don't really remember when that started happening. The Swamp is really going to have to pick up its game if Gawker Media goes under.
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

but I check it multiple times a day at this point and I don't really remember when that started happening.
There's enough good/fun stuff to make it worthwhile. Same goes for all of their sites. I don't go to the main site very often, but there have been times when I've been a semi-regular reader.

I was skimming Gawker the day that the Geithner article was posted. I read the summary, shrugged, and kept scrolling. It didn't even register that it was more sleazy than their usual fare. It wasn't until the next day, when I saw the on-line blowback, that I realized what was going on. The fact that Denton was the one who pulled it, and his top editors then resigned, made it all seem very bizarro world.

This was all happening as Reddit was beginning to eat itself and Ellen Pao was forced to resign. It was a fun summer if you like media drama.
The Swamp is really going to have to pick up its game if Gawker Media goes under.
I'll do my best.
User avatar
Rush2112
The Dude
Posts: 7281
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 4:35 pm
Location: Cyrus X-1
Contact:

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Rush2112 »

Image
Did you see that ludicrous display last night?
User avatar
Rex
The Dude
Posts: 7264
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 3:10 pm

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Rex »

I would think that any assets (i.e., websites) that have any value could be sold at a fire sale price. But, have no opinion as to whether any of these sites actually have any positive value. And the buyer would most likely remake the sites in its own editorial image, much like Trump did to Bloom County in a more innocent time.

As for Hulk, he remains one of my all time favorite celebrity brushes, so I will always have a soft spot.
User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

By the way, if you haven't kept up on AJ Daulerio, he founded Ratter, which was partly funded by Denton. It was supposed to be an SB Nation-type network of sites about sleazy political news, I guess?

It launched, then it went on hiatus. Daulerio fired the entire editorial staff. Then it relaunched. Now it's on hiatus again. It bills itself as 'the underbelly of everything,' so I don't think we're missing anything.
howard
Karl Hungus
Posts: 9467
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 12:00 pm

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by howard »

Johnnie wrote: Which would mean bye bye to Deadspin, Gizmodo, Likehacker, Jalopnik, Kotaku, and Jezebel.
I find myself on these sites almost never. Maybe once a week someone will point me at Deadspin, the rest rarely. Am I typical of the geezer generation, or an outlier even amongst old folks.
Who knows? Maybe, you were kidnapped, tied up, taken away and held for ransom.

Those days are gone forever
Over a long time ago
Oh yeah…
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18066
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by sancarlos »

howard wrote:
Johnnie wrote: Which would mean bye bye to Deadspin, Gizmodo, Likehacker, Jalopnik, Kotaku, and Jezebel.
I find myself on these sites almost never. Maybe once a week someone will point me at Deadspin, the rest rarely. Am I typical of the geezer generation, or an outlier even amongst old folks.
I have Deadpspin on my Facebook feed, so I click links to stories fairly often.
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

howard wrote:
Johnnie wrote: Which would mean bye bye to Deadspin, Gizmodo, Likehacker, Jalopnik, Kotaku, and Jezebel.
I find myself on these sites almost never. Maybe once a week someone will point me at Deadspin, the rest rarely. Am I typical of the geezer generation, or an outlier even amongst old folks.
I'm 42, and the Gawker sites make me feel ancient. Then again, bingo halls and VFW gatherings make me feel ancient. I'd say you're far from unique, howard.
User avatar
DaveInSeattle
The Dude
Posts: 8395
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 5:51 am
Location: Seattle, WA

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by DaveInSeattle »

howard wrote:
Johnnie wrote: Which would mean bye bye to Deadspin, Gizmodo, Likehacker, Jalopnik, Kotaku, and Jezebel.
I find myself on these sites almost never. Maybe once a week someone will point me at Deadspin, the rest rarely. Am I typical of the geezer generation, or an outlier even amongst old folks.
I read Deadspin fairly often, but usually just skim the headlines. The other sites...not so much.
User avatar
The Sybian
The Dude
Posts: 18872
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 10:36 am
Location: Working in the Crap Part of Jersey

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by The Sybian »

howard wrote:
Johnnie wrote: Which would mean bye bye to Deadspin, Gizmodo, Likehacker, Jalopnik, Kotaku, and Jezebel.
I find myself on these sites almost never. Maybe once a week someone will point me at Deadspin, the rest rarely. Am I typical of the geezer generation, or an outlier even amongst old folks.

The only time any of these sites are on my radar is when someone here links a Deadspin article. And when Gawker made fun of me and my wife. I would think they would be smart enough to incorporate each of the sites individually, so the lawsuit would only effect Gawker.

Back when Bubba the Love Sponge was on the Stern Network, Stern had Bubba on all the time. Couldn't stand him, so I never listened to his show, but Bubba had a very unhealthy obsession with Hulk. They were both in Tampa and became friends. Bubba talked about letting his wife bang Hulk, which was really disturbing.
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16735
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Johnnie »

Tack on $25 million more for punitive damages and a response by Nick Denton that I won't be reading in its entirety.

It has been funny watching a dude troll the hell out of Gawker posts though. Named himself Hulkster and just decides to make ridiculous comments.
mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29048
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by mister d »

I read the sites every day (good for pooping/train) but I have no problem with the decision. If this were an actress "who made her sexuality" part of her persona, I trust/hope it wouldn't have even been up for debate.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
Brontoburglar
The Dude
Posts: 5851
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:20 am

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Brontoburglar »

mister d wrote:I read the sites every day (good for pooping/train) but I have no problem with the decision. If this were an actress "who made her sexuality" part of her persona, I trust/hope it wouldn't have even been up for debate.
If Hogan knew that he was being filmed -- as Gawker alleges -- I imagine this changes quite a bit.
"We're not the smartest people in the world. We go down the straightaway and turn left. That's literally what we do." -- Clint Bowyer
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29048
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by mister d »

Knew he was being filmed or knew he was being filmed for distribution?
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
Brontoburglar
The Dude
Posts: 5851
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:20 am

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Brontoburglar »

mister d wrote:Knew he was being filmed or knew he was being filmed for distribution?
Moreover, the basis of his claim that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy during his sexual encounters with Heather Cole, then Bubba’s wife, was that Hogan didn’t know he was being filmed. From the documents released by the appellate court, it is now clear that this is contradicted by multiple statements Bubba made to FBI agents asserting that Hogan knew full well that Bubba had wired his bedroom for video and was filming. We were barred from presenting that crucial evidence to the jury, or asking Bubba how much his most intimate friend knew about the couple’s sexual practices.

Hogan initially blamed his friend for the tape’s release, but later settled his lawsuit against Bubba for the sum of $5,000 and a pledge to play the role that Hogan needed him to in the litigation against Gawker. Bubba complied, asserting his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination to avoid answering our questions about Hogan’s role in the tape’s genesis; the trial court allowed him to keep his end of his settlement bargain and prevented us from putting him on the witness stand.
"We're not the smartest people in the world. We go down the straightaway and turn left. That's literally what we do." -- Clint Bowyer
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29048
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by mister d »

Hmmm, not sure I understand that. I'm sure most revenge porn cases are with participants who know they're being filmed, right?
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

It seems that a lot of evidence was inadmissible in this trial, so Gawker does have a case for an appeal. Be strong, appellate judges!

Denton's two main arguments: a) Hogan probably knew about the video, and b) he's a celebrity, so his reasonable expectation of privacy differs from that of non-celebrities. In fact, he's apparently not entitled to any privacy at all.
Celebrities, especially ones as public about their personal and sex life as Hulk Hogan, have a narrower zone of privacy than ordinary people. Regardless of questions about Gawker’s editorial standards and methods, self-promoters should not be allowed to seek attention around a specific topic and then claim privacy when the narrative takes an unwelcome turn. The benefits of publicity come at a price; and for someone like Hogan, whose whole life is a performance, it’s a full-time and long-term commitment.
I agree with this up to a certain point. (Like, it's newsworthy that a moralizer like Bill Cosby might be a monster.) But not when it involves showing unauthorized clips of home movies, even if they 'joined an existing conversation and explored the public’s fascination with celebrity sex tapes.'

And his positioning of himself as a First Amendment martyr is laughable.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20209
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by rass »

Hogan lawsuit may have been bankrolled by a Silicon Valley billionaire with a grudge
It all comes down to a simple point. You may not like Gawker. They've published stories I would have been ashamed to publish. But if the extremely wealthy, under a veil secrecy, can destroy publications they want to silence, that's a far bigger threat to freedom of the press than most of the things we commonly worry about on that front. If this is the new weapon in the arsenal of the super rich, few publications will have the resources or the death wish to scrutinize them closely.
I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
tennbengal
The Dude
Posts: 11975
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by tennbengal »

I knew that had Gavin Belsen's fingerprints all over it.
User avatar
Giff
The Dude
Posts: 10804
Joined: Mon Mar 25, 2013 3:26 pm

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Giff »

rass wrote:Hogan lawsuit may have been bankrolled by a Silicon Valley billionaire with a grudge
It all comes down to a simple point. You may not like Gawker. They've published stories I would have been ashamed to publish. But if the extremely wealthy, under a veil secrecy, can destroy publications they want to silence, that's a far bigger threat to freedom of the press than most of the things we commonly worry about on that front. If this is the new weapon in the arsenal of the super rich, few publications will have the resources or the death wish to scrutinize them closely.
But but, SAFE SPACES!!!!
well this is gonna be someone's new signature - bronto
User avatar
sancarlos
The Dude
Posts: 18066
Joined: Fri Mar 15, 2013 1:46 pm
Location: NorCal via Colorado

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by sancarlos »

rass wrote:Hogan lawsuit may have been bankrolled by a Silicon Valley billionaire with a grudge
It all comes down to a simple point. You may not like Gawker. They've published stories I would have been ashamed to publish. But if the extremely wealthy, under a veil secrecy, can destroy publications they want to silence, that's a far bigger threat to freedom of the press than most of the things we commonly worry about on that front. If this is the new weapon in the arsenal of the super rich, few publications will have the resources or the death wish to scrutinize them closely.
Valid points. But, then again, if Gawker didn't behave in a scummy, shady manner, there would be no lawsuit to bankroll.
"What a bunch of pedantic pricks." - sybian
User avatar
Steve of phpBB
The Dude
Posts: 8439
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:44 am
Location: Feeling gravity's pull

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Steve of phpBB »

sancarlos wrote:
rass wrote:Hogan lawsuit may have been bankrolled by a Silicon Valley billionaire with a grudge
It all comes down to a simple point. You may not like Gawker. They've published stories I would have been ashamed to publish. But if the extremely wealthy, under a veil secrecy, can destroy publications they want to silence, that's a far bigger threat to freedom of the press than most of the things we commonly worry about on that front. If this is the new weapon in the arsenal of the super rich, few publications will have the resources or the death wish to scrutinize them closely.
Valid points. But, then again, if Gawker didn't behave in a scummy, shady manner, there would be no lawsuit to bankroll.
Yup. This billionaire didn't force them to post a sex tape.
And his one problem is he didn’t go to Russia that night because he had extracurricular activities, and they froze to death.
User avatar
mister d
The Dude
Posts: 29048
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 8:15 am

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by mister d »

And, if you read deeper, his hatred appears to be based in their attempts to publicly out him. Its probably a universal bad, but its hard to not see and take his side.
Johnnie wrote: Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20209
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by rass »

I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
tennbengal
The Dude
Posts: 11975
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2013 7:07 pm

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by tennbengal »


The other six properties (Deadspin, Jezebel et al) apparently will go on. Not sure why gawker.com gets the axe in the end, weird.
User avatar
Brontoburglar
The Dude
Posts: 5851
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:20 am

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Brontoburglar »

tennbengal wrote:

The other six properties (Deadspin, Jezebel et al) apparently will go on. Not sure why gawker.com gets the axe in the end, weird.
yeah, I'm looking forward to reading the explanation. I also don't know how the main site stacks up to the others in terms of traffic (figure it's No. 2 behind DS or No. 1).
"We're not the smartest people in the world. We go down the straightaway and turn left. That's literally what we do." -- Clint Bowyer
Johnnie
The Dude
Posts: 16735
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:31 pm
Location: TUCSON, BITCH!

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by Johnnie »

To pile on...not sure it was linked, but did you want to see a lawyer curbstomp AJ Daulerio on the stand at trial? I know you did!

mister d wrote:Couldn't have pegged me better.
EnochRoot wrote:I mean, whatever. Johnnie's all hot cuz I ride him.
User avatar
rass
The Dude
Posts: 20209
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 9:41 am
Location: N effin' J

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by rass »

I felt aswirl with warm secretions.
User avatar
bapo!
The Big Lebowski
Posts: 1729
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 1:47 pm
Location: in the 'high danger' areas

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by bapo! »

I meant to post this a week ago but forgot. Esquire caught up with our friend AJ Daulerio. The takeaway: he's a recovering addict, and he may have recovered a memory of being molested when he was a kid. This certainly muddies the waters. I want to be able to hate him without complication, and I can't really do that in good conscience. But if you read the article, you'll be reminded why it's okay to hate him, at least a little bit.
User avatar
A_B
The Dude
Posts: 23323
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2013 7:36 am
Location: Getting them boards like a wolf in the chicken pen.

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by A_B »

color me skeptical.
You know what you need? A lyrical sucker punch to the face.
User avatar
duff
Donny
Posts: 2745
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2013 3:36 pm

Re: The Hulk Hogan/Gawker trial

Post by duff »

https://youtu.be/G9v6ea9FL6M

Just saw this last week. It might be a year old, but it is great.
To quote both Bruce Prichard and Tony Schiavone, "Fuck Duff Meltzer."
Post Reply