mister d wrote: ↑Wed Nov 30, 2022 3:07 pm
Wright's xG on that play is under 0.1 on both FBRef and Infogol.
How does a striker not check the xG on FBRef and Infogol before deciding whether to shoot? That's just laziness. But seriously, if I'm coaching a player shoots in that situation, his tournament is done. Incredibly selfish and stupid. Iran's goalie quickly pushed the ball downfield and Iran could have caught the US up field and scored there, when a dribble to the corner could have iced the game.
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
Or you could dribble to the corner and play a dumb trick trying to win a throw and lose it and get beat on a third ball. When you have a good chance to end it you take it. I wouldn't want my outside back screaming for a cross but I'm all ok with my 9 trying to finish
Johnny Carwash wrote: ↑Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:45 pm
Almost as bad as calling him John instead of Rob?
e: Shit. It's John Strong (PBP guy) and Rob Stone (studio host). So we both screwed up.
There ya go.
Whatever his name was, my watch party crew wanted to wring his neck by the middle of the second half. STFU, everyone watching that game knows the deal. Call the game.
Also, maybe chill the fuck out just a tiny bit? He sounded like someone was abducting his children for the last 30 minutes of the game. I said it to the group I was with, I would've changed over to Telemundo if I wanted histrionics. The mute button would've been smashed about 15 minutes into the second half. Guy just made an already very difficult game to watch that much more annoying.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
mister d wrote: ↑Wed Nov 30, 2022 4:58 pm
I was speaking more to the implication it was a smart play, Mr. Syb.
So .1 is a high percentage shot? I don't know how this shit works. Regardless of whether it's a high percentage chance to score, when you factor in the game situation, it's a boneheaded play.
An honest to God cult of personality - formed around a failed steak salesman.
-Pruitt
They absolutely need to change the offsides rule now that they have this technology. The point of the exercise is to INCREASE goals, not take a fingernail (literally) of a body part to justify an offsides ruling.
I know this is where Wenger is trying to take things, so hopefully this is the last WC where these types of calls are being made. Any part of the body is kept onsides, that's a good goal/not called offsides.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Croatia is going to get increasingly defensive now. Hard to play for a draw for this long, but that's a very veteran/savvy group of players. Belgium is going to need a moment of brilliance, but it's certainly all to play for... This has been an incredible week of soccer.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Nonlinear FC wrote: ↑Thu Dec 01, 2022 10:10 amI don't think my wife paid enough attention to that movie to get that reference.
Definitely the Mister D Family Movie of 2022 in terms of one the entire family enjoyed. My youngest thinks post Room on Fire Julian Casablancas sounds "just like Kip" and she's not entirely wrong.
Johnnie wrote: ↑Sat Sep 10, 2022 8:13 pmOh shit, you just reminded me about toilet paper.
Croatia and Belgium playing hard but not real pretty. Lots of miskicks, not quite sharp enough on both sides. Agree on offsides but did allow the ref to fix the dive in the box problem. Not sure if they waved the penalty off for the dive or offside
I think we'll see him on Saturday, as I don't think CP10 is gonna be healthy enough to go. I also think Reyna and Weah up top would be an absolute terror.
You can lead a horse to fish, but you can't fish out a horse.
Has to be against the rules to start taking off players by coach agreement. Both sides incented. No guess not. Canada in last. Hard to tell who has to win with the sound off. Guess that's why they're pressing with a bad press