The Swamp

A_B wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 8:57 amFor some reason I thought I was in the thread with the Salma Hayek picture and that's what you were referring to. And yeah, I think I probably would pay for that 24 hours, too.

mister d wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:01 am

A_B wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 8:57 amFor some reason I thought I was in the thread with the Salma Hayek picture and that's what you were referring to. And yeah, I think I probably would pay for that 24 hours, too.

Perhaps I can pivot my persona here to "very specific pervert".



(I still maintain that if she weren't famous, I wouldn't have noticed her any more than any other good looking mom on the street.)

The Sybian wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:13 am

mister d wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:01 am

A_B wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 8:57 amFor some reason I thought I was in the thread with the Salma Hayek picture and that's what you were referring to. And yeah, I think I probably would pay for that 24 hours, too.

Perhaps I can pivot my persona here to "very specific pervert".



(I still maintain that if she weren't famous, I wouldn't have noticed her any more than any other good looking mom on the street.)

I saw her in person once, and she was jaw droppingly stunning. Granted she was dolled up for an awards show, but she stood out more than any of the other models/actresses I saw. She was also surprisingly tiny.

mister d wrote: ↑Wed Sep 22, 2021 9:24 am She definitely wasn't wearing that dress.

"I wish to specific my public apology to Jalen Smerak,” Deniski captioned the submit. Throughout the “Kremenchuk” – “Donbass” match, I, being in destructive feelings, confirmed gestures that somebody may contemplate as an insult to the race. I respect all folks no matter their race or nationality. Sadly, feelings are totally different in hockey."

Ryan wrote: ↑Wed Sep 29, 2021 7:47 am Hey Siri, invent a foreign currency

Johnnie wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:00 pm I simply fucking can't with some white people, man.

pruitt2 wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 5:17 pm

Johnnie wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 4:00 pm I simply fucking can't with some white people, man.

They are getting closer and closer to just spouting the N word and not even making excuses.

To begin with, she used the N-word.

Not in the sense of quoting a racist, or singing along to a rap song, or reading To Kill A Mockingbird, or even debating whether it was acceptable to use the N-word. In the sense of calling a Black woman a racial slur.

In reaction to a New York Post story, "MSNBC’s Joy Reid: Conservatives would trade tax cuts to ‘openly say the N-word,'" Gab user Lesley Anne Haskell declared that Reid was "the true definition of the word" and then explicitly typed out the slur.

Gab is a social media platform launched as a less restrictive alternative to Facebook and Twitter. And Haskell appeared to relish that, posting an image proclaiming that on Gab it was "perfectly OK and legal" to use racial slurs for Black people, Chinese people, White people, Hispanic people, Jewish people, and gay people, and if people didn't like it, they "aren't ready for free speech" and shouldn't "try to change how we do things."

Gab has quickly become a pit of misogyny, antisemitism, and White nationalism.

Indeed, on multiple occasions on Gab, Haskell describes herself as a "proud White nationalist," though takes pains to insist she is not a "White supremacist."

The Sybian wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 9:28 pm I'm sure the overwhelming majority of GOP will vote no to anyone Biden nominates, even if it was a white guy who idolizes Scalia and promised to overturn Roe, but I don't like the way Biden declared he is only looking at black women. It diminishes the nomination for whomever he selects, because it just feels like an affirmative action selection now. We are overdue for a black woman on the bench, and it sounds like he has several well-qualified black women to choose from, but there was no need to declare he is only looking at black women. Just select a black woman without saying it. Realistically, you can't say he is potentially overlooking "better qualified" candidates because of race and gender, because you are either qualified or not, and anything else is quibbling over subjective preferences.

degenerasian wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 11:30 pm I agree. He could just nominate one without declaring and still keep his promise. The Democrats seem to get tied up in big gesture actions or policies.

The Sybian wrote: ↑Sat Jan 29, 2022 9:28 pm I'm sure the overwhelming majority of GOP will vote no to anyone Biden nominates, even if it was a white guy who idolizes Scalia and promised to overturn Roe, but I don't like the way Biden declared he is only looking at black women. It diminishes the nomination for whomever he selects, because it just feels like an affirmative action selection now. We are overdue for a black woman on the bench, and it sounds like he has several well-qualified black women to choose from, but there was no need to declare he is only looking at black women. Just select a black woman without saying it. Realistically, you can't say he is potentially overlooking "better qualified" candidates because of race and gender, because you are either qualified or not, and anything else is quibbling over subjective preferences.

A_B wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 9:19 pm They lost on livestreams today to a watermelon British people think may last longer than Truss.

Pruitt3 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 15, 2022 6:49 am

A_B wrote: ↑Fri Oct 14, 2022 9:19 pm They lost on livestreams today to a watermelon British people think may last longer than Truss.

Is that true?

Hilarious.

LIV golf is available on DAZN up here, but it's usually listed after the darts and snooker.

The letter, with no name attached to it, did not cite which law the course violated or what in the curriculum was objectionable. The department did not respond to questions asking for more details.

mister d wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:26 am If you thought his name sounds weird, check the full article. Top tier dork.

The Sybian wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:08 am

mister d wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:26 am If you thought his name sounds weird, check the full article. Top tier dork.

Hadn't read the article before... He was charged with trying to bring 15 kilos of fentanyl across the border from Mexico. Customs found the drugs in a secret compartment of his car. He said he was paid $215. So if fentanyl the size of a grain of rice can kill like 10 people, how many people could OD on 15 kilos? And he risked getting caught for $215? More strange, if he was caught with that much fentanyl, why was he released? Maybe fentanyl in pill form is much less potent, but 15 kilos sounds like an awful lot.

Steve of phpBB wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 11:12 am

The Sybian wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 10:08 am

mister d wrote: ↑Wed Feb 15, 2023 9:26 am If you thought his name sounds weird, check the full article. Top tier dork.

Hadn't read the article before... He was charged with trying to bring 15 kilos of fentanyl across the border from Mexico. Customs found the drugs in a secret compartment of his car. He said he was paid $215. So if fentanyl the size of a grain of rice can kill like 10 people, how many people could OD on 15 kilos? And he risked getting caught for $215? More strange, if he was caught with that much fentanyl, why was he released? Maybe fentanyl in pill form is much less potent, but 15 kilos sounds like an awful lot.

"But I was told we have an open border!"