Page 1 of 3

Immaculate grid

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 2:56 pm
by Brontoburglar
how has this board not gotten in on this or posted about it here?

https://www.immaculategrid.com/

(note: today's is not limited to pitchers, so you don't have to find a pitcher for the middle square)

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:04 pm
by BSF21
www.puckdoku.com for our hockey friends.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:27 pm
by EdRomero
Brontoburglar wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 2:56 pm how has this board not gotten in on this or posted about it here?

https://www.immaculategrid.com/

(note: today's is not limited to pitchers, so you don't have to find a pitcher for the middle square)
I just got into this a few days ago and love it. Baseball card collecting in the past helps, quitting fantasy baseball a few years ago does not.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:37 pm
by Johnny Carwash
Immaculate Grid 94 7/9:

⬜️🟩⬜️
🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩

I don't follow baseball anywhere nearly as closely as I did 20-30 years ago, so Tampa Bay line was going to wreck me.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 8:48 pm
by MaxWebster
yup - i've been obsessing over this since i was told about it 3 weeks ago.

i'm just glad there's only 1 per day.

i've got 50 years of knowledge, Statis Pro Baseball game, and Topps cards to go on so I usually get at least 8 but my biggest weaknesses are anything around saves (who gives a shit) and for some reason i have almost no relative knowledge of the Diamondbacks/Marlins/Rays/Rockies - I find I have to get a bit lucky on those. My default for thinking about teams is in the 1978-1986 timeframe and I obviously can't cross anyone to those teams...

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Thu Jul 06, 2023 8:48 pm
by MaxWebster
oh my god how could you.

<sigh>

<<...bookmarks it on phone...>>
BSF21 wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:04 pm www.puckdoku.com for our hockey friends.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:05 am
by The Sybian
Is there a version limited to 1998 or earlier?

ETA: looks like I was overly ambitious with that date. Looked at the hockey one, had to Google the Blue Jackets logo to know what team they were asking. Can’t believe they started in 1997, would have thought I was cognizant of hockey enough then to know the team. Literally can’t name one player that played for the franchise. Late 80s to early 90s, I could have named 15 players on every roster, and probably saw 30% of them play in the minors.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:02 am
by Steve of phpBB
The Sybian wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:05 am Is there a version limited to 1998 or earlier?

ETA: looks like I was overly ambitious with that date. Looked at the hockey one, had to Google the Blue Jackets logo to know what team they were asking. Can’t believe they started in 1997, would have thought I was cognizant of hockey enough then to know the team. Literally can’t name one player that played for the franchise. Late 80s to early 90s, I could have named 15 players on every roster, and probably saw 30% of them play in the minors.
Yeah, this is me too, though maybe ten years earlier. I have no idea who’s been on the Rangers and Marlins or who on the Royals got 40 saves. But give me the NL East of 1977-1984 and I’ll kill it.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:54 am
by Brontoburglar
you don't know Dan Quisenberry?!

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:13 am
by mister d
I cheated because who knows anyone who played for Colorado and Detroit but now I think I get the concept.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:14 am
by Johnny Carwash
mister d wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:13 am I cheated because who knows anyone who played for Colorado and Detroit but now I think I get the concept.
That's my last empty square for today but I haven't given up yet.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:20 am
by The Sybian
Brontoburglar wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:54 am you don't know Dan Quisenberry?!
Things that make me feel old: I'm two years older than Dan Quisenberry when he died (45).

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:21 am
by MaxWebster
totally struggling w that square today.

also it's funny that i realized i posted i'm weak on the "expansion teams" when they have all been in existence for like 30 years. FFFFFUUUUUUCCCCC....


unfortunately middle relievers are so fungible in mlb and in my brain that they are a great answer for a lot of these that i can't get. i find this is where what exists of my "old school baseball" mentality creeps in ("ahhh it was easier when staffs only had 10 guys on it!")


mister d wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:13 am I cheated because who knows anyone who played for Colorado and Detroit but now I think I get the concept.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:30 am
by L-Jam3
The Sybian wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:20 am
Brontoburglar wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:54 am you don't know Dan Quisenberry?!
Things that make me feel old: I'm two years older than Dan Quisenberry when he died (45).
He died of brain cancer like a lot of guys/dudes who spent their home games on shitty 70s/80s/90s turf, like Johnny Oates, Tug McGraw, Darren Daulton... shit. A lot of Phillies. That Vet turf was a friggin WMD.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:33 am
by sancarlos
I do pretty good on the hockey ones, but my old hockey brain remembers obscure ones while forgetting obvious ones.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:22 pm
by DSafetyGuy
My brain is so wired into my baseball card-collecting years (ending in the late 1980's) that it took me almost a week after the fact to remember the Tigers have two guys who played for Philly last year on their roster (well, one got sent down - I answered Lance Parrish). The most recent player I used in one grid was Jack McDowell and I had another one where I remembered "that third baseman who signed a massive extension while still in the minors" for the Rays (six games in MLB, whatever) because I couldn't remember Evan Longoria's name.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 12:35 pm
by Steve of phpBB
Brontoburglar wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 10:54 am you don't know Dan Quisenberry?!
I know Quiz. But no idea if he got to 40.

I tried Lee Smith as a 40-save guy for Boston. Nope.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 1:21 pm
by Reaper
The entire left side of today's grid I picked the "most popular answer" and I was surprised about top left.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:14 pm
by The Sybian
Johnny Carwash wrote: Thu Jul 06, 2023 3:37 pm Immaculate Grid 94 7/9:

⬜️🟩⬜️
🟩🟩🟩
🟩🟩🟩

I don't follow baseball anywhere nearly as closely as I did 20-30 years ago, so Tampa Bay line was going to wreck me.
I decided to give this a shot, but I had the Rockies, so that column was a waste, as you can't repeat players. If you got extra points for low % answers, I might be competitive. Of my 5 correct answers, 3 were under 10%, one was 19% and the other was 40%. Of the 6 most popular answers who played for 2 teams, I've only heard of 1.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:29 pm
by Rex
mister d wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:13 am I cheated because who knows anyone who played for Colorado and Detroit but now I think I get the concept.
Took a wild ass guess of an obvious Tiger who must have played for other teams and I got it. 9 for 9! What does the rarity score mean?

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:41 pm
by mister d
It feels like this entire thread should be treated as a spoiler alert so we can actually talk about the game?

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:43 pm
by The Sybian
Rex wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:29 pm
mister d wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 11:13 am I cheated because who knows anyone who played for Colorado and Detroit but now I think I get the concept.
Took a wild ass guess of an obvious Tiger who must have played for other teams and I got it. 9 for 9! What does the rarity score mean?
% of people who gave that answer.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 6:55 pm
by Brontoburglar
mister d wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:41 pm It feels like this entire thread should be treated as a spoiler alert so we can actually talk about the game?
I wondered about that. I used Octavio Dotel as my Tiger and Rocky(ie?)

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:26 pm
by Rex
Tulowitzki, Claudell Washington, Mickey Mantle. That’s all that really matters here

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:53 pm
by Rex
There’s an NFL one and it’s fucking impossible!

https://dynasty-daddy.com/gridiron

Who on Earth knows anyone that ever played for the Browns?

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:07 pm
by L-Jam3
Brontoburglar wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 6:55 pm
mister d wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 2:41 pm It feels like this entire thread should be treated as a spoiler alert so we can actually talk about the game?
I wondered about that. I used Octavio Dotel as my Tiger and Rocky(ie?)
From here on in, he’s going to be my go to. That guy played for everyone.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:34 pm
by The Sybian
Rex wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:53 pm There’s an NFL one and it’s fucking impossible!

https://dynasty-daddy.com/gridiron

Who on Earth knows anyone that ever played for the Browns?
Looks like this version doesnt go back beyond 1999.

And my son fucking destroyed this grid in 20 seconds.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:51 pm
by sancarlos
The Sybian wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:34 pm
Rex wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:53 pm There’s an NFL one and it’s fucking impossible!

https://dynasty-daddy.com/gridiron

Who on Earth knows anyone that ever played for the Browns?
Looks like this version doesnt go back beyond 1999.
But that’s all I remember!

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2023 7:48 am
by L-Jam3
Got them all for the first time today with a rarity score of 44 (I think less is better) by pulling names like
[+] spoiler
Phil Garner, Dick Groat, Vida Blue, Jose Cruz Jr (no face), Carl Hubbell, Lefty Grove, Pat Hentgen, and Hal Newhouser.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2023 9:36 am
by Rex
Only 7 for me today. I totally blanked on the Blue Jays.

And I'd do it again!

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2023 10:52 am
by mister d
Mine would have been amazing if I didn’t miss on Stieb and just mail it in answering Bonds because I was annoyed.



(It seems I work in order, down the first column then down the second …)

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Sat Jul 08, 2023 6:00 pm
by Brontoburglar
took way too long to think of top left today

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2023 6:19 pm
by Brontoburglar
A certain Twins Cy Young winner at 88% usage today was the highest number I've seen so far

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2023 6:29 pm
by The Sybian
Brontoburglar wrote: Mon Jul 10, 2023 6:19 pm A certain Twins Cy Young winner at 88% usage today was the highest number I've seen so far
I was shocked my answer was only 10%
[+] spoiler
Frank Viola

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2023 9:44 pm
by mister d
Does anyone else quit if they miss one?

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2023 10:05 pm
by Johnnie

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 9:52 am
by Brontoburglar
The Sybian wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 8:34 pm
Rex wrote: Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:53 pm There’s an NFL one and it’s fucking impossible!

https://dynasty-daddy.com/gridiron

Who on Earth knows anyone that ever played for the Browns?
Looks like this version doesnt go back beyond 1999.

And my son fucking destroyed this grid in 20 seconds.
the right side today is proof of why the nfl one stinks. you gotta go with stuff that has more than one answer

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 10:38 am
by rass

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 10:46 am
by mister d
I absolutely killed it today. No answers > 4% until the last one hit 50%.

Re: Immaculate grid

Posted: Tue Jul 11, 2023 11:26 am
by Brontoburglar
the post-game stats are awesome now